Investment accounts
Adult accounts
Child accounts
Choosing Fidelity
Choosing Fidelity
Why invest with us Current offers Fees and charges Open an account Transfer investments
Financial advice & support
Fidelity’s Services
Fidelity’s Services
Financial advice Retirement Wealth Management Investor Centre (London) Bereavement
Guidance and tools
Guidance and tools
Choosing investments Choosing accounts ISA calculator Retirement calculators
Shares
Share dealing
Choose your shares
Tools and information
Tools and information
Share prices and markets Chart and compare shares Stock market news Shareholder perks
Pensions & retirement
Pensions, tax & tools
Saving for retirement
Approaching / In retirement
Approaching / In retirement
Speak to a specialist Creating a retirement plan Taking tax-free cash Pension drawdown Annuities Investing in retirement Investment Pathways
Broker tips: Rolls-Royce, Unilever, B&M, Tesco
(Sharecast News) - Rolls-Royce slumped on Monday after Citi downgraded its stance on the shares to 'neutral' from buy' on valuation grounds. "Following a strong recovery from the depths of Covid, we believe Rolls-Royce shares are now approaching what we consider to be current fair value," it said.
"We have increased our target price to 641p, leaving some upside, but insufficient to remain buyers."
Elsewhere, RBC Capital Markets downgraded Unilever to 'underperform' from 'sector perform' and slashed the price target to 4,000p from 4,800p.
The bank said Unilever "hasn't the wherewithal" to boost volume performance sufficiently to achieve its 2% growth aspiration given its lack of market dominance, significant non-focus brands and markets (25%/15% of sales respectively), a less benign gross margin environment and record/intention of significantly lower capital investment than the competition.
It said the valuation is pushing towards best-in-class level which it thinks is unjustified, while risk/ reward is weighted to the downside.
"There is no single reason for this downgrade," RBC said. "Rather, we believe that investors' perception of Unilever has shifted from laggard to best-in-class on the back of a revived senior management team, a couple of good quarters benefiting from very strong gross margin bounce-back (just as at P&G), well-received rhetoric around operational strategy and the decision to offload the ice cream business.
"We have no problem with any of this, but think that the shares' 32% outperformance versus the MSCI European consumer staples sector in 2024 was excessive."
RBC said Unilever's portfolio is solid rather than spectacular. "It's the market leader in its business, but to a much lesser extent than Nestlé, for example," it said.
It also said that volume growth has averaged less than 1% per year since 2014 and RBC doesn't expect that getting rid of the ice cream segment will do much to boost that.
"In our view the 2% aspiration is a big ask," RBC said.
"Nor do we expect emerging markets to close the gap," it added, noting that emerging market participation has barely moved over the last decade despite superior "organic" growth, a victim of EM currency depreciation.
RBC said the company's focus on 30 Power Brands and 24 key markets makes sense as far as it goes, but despite management's protestations, it worries that the remaining 25%/15% of sales (comprising about 370 brands or 100 OneUnilever markets) risk being neglected and dragging down the whole.
The bank also pointed out that brand investment has increased sharply, but said it can't extrapolate that with confidence.
"Unilever has benefited from a benign gross margin environment and arguably could/should have invested more," it said.
RBC said it thinks that Unilever has significantly under-invested in capex over the long term and believes that a prolonged increase is needed if Unilever is to have any chance of hitting its 2% volume growth goal.
"The consequent decline in depreciation (-140bps since 2020) as well as much higher restructuring costs than peers (ignored in 'underlying' profits) materially diminish Unilever's earnings quality in our view," the bank added.
Citi reiterated its 'buy' calls on retailers Tesco and B&M amid a "lacklustre" consumer backdrop as food inflation begins to reaccelerate.
UK discretionary retail expenditure in 2025 is expected to see a modest real-term decline of 0.4%, with price pressures picking up for the grocery sector, as a result of companies passing through higher costs to customers in the aftermath of the autumn budget last October, the investment bank said.
"We highlight Tesco and B&M as our top 'buy'-rated picks," Citi said in a research note.
"We expect Tesco to continue to take share in an inflationary grocery market, driven by strong pricing credentials, the success of its Finest range, investment in stores and an ability to under-inflate vs. the market. We expect B&M to benefit from its compelling price offer in the context of customers increasingly shopping around as grocery inflation accelerates."
Citi kept its target price for Tesco (last updated at 425p) unchanged, but raised its target for B&M from 510p to 520p.
Share this article
Related Sharecast Articles
Important information: This information is not a personal recommendation for any particular investment. If you are unsure about the suitability of an investment you should speak to one of Fidelity’s advisers or an authorised financial adviser of your choice. When you are thinking about investing in shares, it’s generally a good idea to consider holding them alongside other investments in a diversified portfolio of assets. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Award-winning online share dealing
Search, compare and select from thousands of shares.
Expert insights into investing your money
Our team of experts explore the world of share dealing.
Policies and important information
Accessibility | Conflicts of interest statement | Consumer Duty Target Market | Consumer Duty Value Assessment Statement | Cookie policy | Diversity, Equity & Inclusion | Doing Business with Fidelity | Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Reports | Investing in Fidelity funds | Legal information | Modern slavery | Mutual respect policy | Privacy statement | Remuneration policy | Staying secure | Statutory and Regulatory disclosures | Whistleblowing programme
Please remember that past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance, the performance of investments is not guaranteed, and the value of your investments can go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invest. When investments have particular tax features, these will depend on your personal circumstances and tax rules may change in the future. This website does not contain any personal recommendations for a particular course of action, service or product. You should regularly review your investment objectives and choices and, if you are unsure whether an investment is suitable for you, you should contact an authorised financial adviser. Before opening an account, please read the ‘Doing Business with Fidelity’ document which incorporates our client terms. Prior to investing into a fund, please read the relevant key information document which contains important information about the fund.
This website is issued by Financial Administration Services Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (FCA Register number 122169) and registered in England and Wales under company number 1629709 whose registered address is Beech Gate, Millfield Lane, Lower Kingswood, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 6RP.