Important information - the value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, so you may get back less than you invest.
Retirement ages is a hot topic. When I talked about this here in May, the response was remarkably polarising.
My suggestion was that working longer, beyond the retirement ages that we mostly aspire to, was not necessarily such a bad thing.
I was speaking primarily to those who feel overwhelmed by meeting their rigorous saving and retirement goals; those daunted by the popular ultra-frugal FIRE approach to life and to saving - Financial Independence, Retire Early.
The contrasting option, I suggested, was to CHILL, an approach where Career Happiness can Inspire Longer Lives. This is about putting greater emphasis on steering your life to a career you enjoy.
The opinion was split. Some were vehemently opposed, committed to leaving the rat race as soon as possible for a perceived nirvana of doing nothing, or at least doing what they want.
Others see the ‘Great Unretirement’ as positive. Staying in work can, for them, maintain purpose, helping them to stay physically and mentally sharp. For some, the appeal is simply the sheer companionship of colleagues.
I was intrigued by a new survey of Fidelity’s Workplace Investing members, with the particular finding focused on those aged 55 and over.1 It found that 27% now expect to work longer than planned. The primary reason was financial, with 43% saying they hadn’t saved enough. But another 19% said they found they were enjoying work and wanted to continue.
To say it again, one in five who carry on do so because they love their job.
Whether you want to work longer or have to work longer, staying in a job can dramatically change your retirement saving sums. But by how much?
Pension boost: the sums
A good starting point is considering how you get to an income of £30,000 in retirement - the number which people are targeting, on average, according to our survey.
To reach that figure with an annuity, where you hand over retirement savings in exchange for a guaranteed income, you would need around £400,000. Based on the latest best buy rates, a 65-year-old would receive £18,508 a year, rising with inflation.2 Throw in the full state pension - £11,502 from age 66 - and you get a tenner more than that desirable £30,000-mark.
To save that £400,000 over 40 years, you would need to save £262 a month, based on a 5% average annual return after charges.
Now let’s assume you’ve embraced CHILL and instead of fully retiring you carry on working one day a week.
One simple way to look at this is that if you needed £400,000 to meet your savings goals, you would need a fifth less - £320,000 - now that you’re continuing to work 20% of the time. And with the target reduced by £80,000, you may need to save less - £210 a month rather than £262.
If you decided to work two days a week, then the pension pot needed may be £240,000, not £400,000.
Now I accept that these scenarios are very theoretical and should be taken with a bucket of salt: it’s unlikely you’d work forever; it depends what work you might earn from the ongoing work; you don’t know if you’ll want to keep working; and on the upside, you could carry on contributing to your pension from your part-time work, with tax relief available up to age 75. The list of ‘what-ifs’ is long.
The numbers, in the interest of simplicity, also brush over the fact you can take 25% of your pension pot as a tax-free lump sum at these levels. So perhaps the target number should be £534,000 rather than £400,000, with £134,000 taken tax-free. But then you could invest that money for more income. The multiple scenarios don’t end there - rather than buying an annuity you could keep the money invested and try to live off the investment income, the ‘drawdown’ route… the twists and turns go on and on.
So yes, pension planning is complicated, and it always needs to be individually tailored. It is for your financial adviser to devise how this should pan out. But I imagine they’d savour the challenge of incorporating ongoing work into those scenarios.
But there is a broader point I’m trying to make, and it goes to the heart of the CHILL philosophy. Namely, if you’re feeling panicked by hearing that you’ll need to accumulate a pot of £300,000, £500,000 or £800,000 to retire then consider this: by cutting one day in five working days, you cut your pension savings needs by a fifth, irrespective of pot size.
Now that’s a wildly simplistic way of expressing it but it broadly holds true. And it is a thought that further adds to the appeal of the CHILL approach to work life and retirement living.
The government’s Pension Wise service offers free, impartial guidance to help you understand your options at retirement. You can access the guidance online at www.moneyhelper.org.uk or over the telephone on 0800 138 3944.
Fidelity’s Retirement Service also has a team of specialists who can provide you with free guidance to help you with your decisions. They can also provide advice and help you select products though this will have a charge.
This article was originally published in This is Money
Source:
1 Survey of Fidelity International Workplace Investing members, conducted May 2024. Findings based on 690 respondents.
2 Williamburrows.com, best buy rates on 5 July.
Important information - investors should note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and all tax rules may change in the future. Withdrawals from a SIPP will not normally be possible until you reach age 55 (57 from 2028). This information is not a personal recommendation for any particular investment. If you are unsure about the suitability of an investment you should speak to one of Fidelity’s advisers or an authorised financial adviser of your choice.
Share this article
Latest articles
Schroder Global Recovery: focused on value
Select 50 option investing in undervalued global stocks
This week in the markets: how investors see Trump 2.0
What’s driving your investments this week?